Posts tagged “REAL ID

Lack of Biometric ID Might Shed Insight into Boston Bombing

In an era when a typical news cycle runs 24 to 48 hours, the mainstream media appears frustrated with the pace of the investigation into the Boston Marathon bombing. Unlike many of the crime dramas portrayed on television, investigations of this nature are painstakingly methodical.

In his blog, journalist Steve Prestegard noted my belief that the improvised explosive devices used in the Boston attack were strategically placed after bomb sniffing dogs had swept the area and were not, as some media outlets speculated, left in trash receptacles.

Yesterday, the FBI released still photographs of two suspects.  By appealing to the public for assistance, it appears that investigators, up until this point, were unable to link the persons of interest through the use of facial recognition software.

Created with the technological support of defense contractor Lockheed Martin, the FBI’s $1.2 billion Next Generation Identification (NGI) network—a system previously tested in a handful of states—uses 3D partial facial recognition software to develop a list of up to two dozen possible suspects. Data bases containing biometric images (mathematical dimensions that measure and catalog eyes, noses, ears, and other facial features) include the new, REAL ID compatible driver’s licenses, international passports, and existing booking photos. Digital images from social networking sites can also be imported to NGI.

Here’s a hint to those who believe Boston is a “homegrown” terror attack: the lack of biometric images linking the suspect in the white ball cap to a fairly expansive data base might mean that this person has been in the country for a relatively short period of time, especially since many states, through their individual DMVs, currently obtain biometric photographs from applicants as young as 15-years-of-age.

Gun Bill Goes Down in Flames

As even casual observers of American politics can see, members of the far-left often show outright contempt for the Second Amendment. The president claims he supports gun ownership, even though reports have surfaced that, during his tenure as a law school instructor, Obama, according to some sources, made statements advocating a handgun ban.

Many believe the Obama administration used the families of Newtown victims as political props to press for restrictions on gun rights, even though the bill rejected by the U.S. Senate would have done little, if anything, to prevent the Sandy Hook School shootings. Adam Lanza, the man who perpetrated the slayings, killed his own mother and then confiscated her firearms to commit the homicides. Lanza did not purchase these guns.

Having worked in law enforcement for decades, I have spoken to several investigators who question the need for more gun laws when those already on the books are under enforced.  Empirical data strongly suggests that those who violate state and federal gun laws receive what is tantamount to a slap on the wrist. This is precisely why straw purchases—a process by which individuals prohibited from possessing firearms solicit non-prohibited persons to buy firearms for them—continue to flourish.

As I noted in an April 10 news release, conducted an extensive survey of 15,000 police officers, the vast majority of whom believe gun control might actually cause more problems than the legislation seeks to solve.

Moreover, the overall percentage of firearms’ related deaths attributed to school shootings is tragic but miniscule. Sadly, 92 percent of firearms homicides are committed with handguns, primarily in central cities. Reading the polling data, SF believes gun control measures are losing public support, as the vast majority of law abiding Americans, it appears, do not believe they should surrender their freedoms because big-city police chiefs cannot get a grip on naro-gang violence.

Take Milwaukee, for example, a city that comprises just 10.9 percent of Wisconsin’s population but, in 2010, accounted for 55 percent of the state’s homicides. Why would gun owners in Eau Claire or Green Bay concede their Second Amendment freedoms because Milwaukee, in comparison, is spiraling out-of-control?


Steve Spingola is an author and retired Milwaukee Police Department homicide detective. His latest print edition only book, Best of the Spingola Files, Volumes I & II, is now available at

If your organization is on the lookout for an outstanding guest speaker, please consider the Spingola Files’ Psychology of Homicide presentation.

For more information, visit and click the “seminars & presentations” icon.

© Steven Spingola, Wales, WI, 2013

Campaign Cash & the Security-Industrial Complex

Each year, special interest groups, many of which are large corporations—either indirectly through their K Street lobbyists or, directly, through political action committees and individual donations—contribute millions of dollars to congressional representatives and senators in Washington, D.C.

In his book No Place to Hide, award-wining journalist Robert O’Harrow, Jr. contends that, after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, congress gave the Bush administration a virtual blank check to build a nation-wide surveillance state. With hundreds of billions of dollars flowing from federal government coffers over 1,900 private corporations quickly formed a new “security-industrial complex.”

In the coming weeks, in order to follow-the-money connected to the purveyors of government surveillance, SF will analyze the Federal Election Commission reports of southeastern Wisconsin’s three congressional representatives.

First up, is Congressman F. James Sensenbrenner.

Elected in 1978, Jim Sensenbrenner is a senior member of the House of Representatives.  Each year, he regularly holds a number of town meetings within the confines of his district, where regular Joes (i.e. those of us not represented by well-heeled lobbyists) can share their concerns.  

A friend of mine, who attended one of Sensenbrenner’s town halls in the Lake Country area about three years ago, showed-up to complain about the three major credit bureaus. When a national bank jacked-up the interest on his credit card from 12.5 to 18.5 percent, my friend decided to shop elsewhere. When a locally owned bank offered a credit card with an eight percent interest rate, he readily accepted; whereby, he paid down and then cancelled the high interest credit card. A few months later, he learned that at least one of the three major credit bureaus downgraded his credit score. The reason: he cancelled a major line of credit that he no longer wanted or needed.

Since many employers review a job applicant’s credit rating and these scores further determine the amount of interest charged by creditors, my friend asked Rep. Sensenbrenner what congress could do to remedy the matter. Sensenbrenner purportedly replied that congress has little regulatory power over credit bureaus and that the banking lobby is very strong in Washington.  Although appreciative of Rep. Sensenbrenner’s candor, he walked away from the town hall meeting with the realization that money is the only voice in Washington that seems to get a fair hearing.

And make no mistake about it—money is what it is all about, which is why it is important to keep an eye on campaign financial filings.  That being said contributions from lobbyist and attorneys limit the public’s ability to follow the money trail.

For example, from July 1, 2009 – June 30, 2011, Jim Sensenbrenner received $34,921 from lobbyists, lawyers and law firms.[1]  Campaign finance reports, however, do not indicate which special interests these entities represent.

In regards to companies linked to the security-industrial complex, during the same period from 2009 – 2011, Sensenbrenner received $11,000 from Honeywell, a maker of high-tech video surveillance systems and $7,000 from Lockheed Martin. 

Traditionally a defense contractor, about 80 percent of Lockheed Martin’s annual revenue emanates from federal government contracts.[2]  However, when the pipeline of cash to the security-industrial complex began flowing, Lockheed-Martin did not miss a beat.  In 2008, the company won a $1 billion deal to develop the FBI’s Next Generation Identification (NGI) network.  NGI uses biometrics—software employing mathematical formulas to develop facial recognition characteristics, voice identification, keystroke rhythm classifications, and iris scans—to identify Americans as they are captured on CCTV, talking on the sidewalk to a friend, or simply typing e-mails. These technologies are the lynchpins of Real ID—legislation introduced by Rep. Sensenbrenner that civil libertarians equate to a national identification card.

From July 1, 2009 – June 30, 2012, Sensenbrenner’s campaign fund received $11,000 from Google’s PAC, as well as $2,500 from Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt and $1,000 from Google’s Kent Walker. While Google is an Internet-based technology company, they have a working relationship with the National Security Agency—America’s top-secret electronic eavesdropping outfit.[3]

Over the same period, General Electric’s PAC contributed $4,000 to Sensenbrenner’s campaign fund.[4]

From 2011 – 2012, Congressman Sensenbrenner’s campaign received a total of $158,877 from political action committee’s.  Ninety-three percent of Sensenbrenner’s campaign fund came from contributions made from outside his Wisconsin congressional district.[5]

NEXT: SF examines Congresswoman Gwen Moore’s campaign donations.


Steve Spingola is an author and retired Milwaukee Police Department homicide detective. His new book, Best of the Spingola Files, is now available at

If your group is in need of a fascinating guest speaker, consider the Spingola Files Psychology of Homicide presentation.  For more information, visit

© Steven Spingola, Wales, WI, 2012

[1] F. “Jim” Sensenbrenner: Republican (Elected 1978) WI House District Five.” 23 May 2012.

[2] “Aerospace and Defense Overview.” 23 May 2012.

[3] “Court Rules that Google-NSA Ties can Remain Secret.” May 12, 2012.  23 May 2012.

[4] “FEC Disclosure Report: Sensenbrenner Committee.” 23 May 2012.

[5] “FEC Disclosure Report: Sensenbrenner Committee.” 23 May 2012.

Liberty Activists Doing the Job the Media Used to Do

To view this article, please checkout Best of the Spingola Files, Vol. II: Here’s Looking at You, available exclusively at in December of 2012.


Steve Spingola is an author and retired Milwaukee Police Department homicide detective. His new book, Best of the Spingola Files, is now available at

If your group is in need of a fascinating guest speaker, consider the Spingola Files Psychology of Homicide presentation.  For more information, visit

© Steven Spingola, Wales, WI, 2012 


[1] Beach, K.  “Friday, March 16, 6 to 8 p.m. CST, AxXiom for Liberty Live.  Guest, Former Homicide Detective, Author Steve Spingola.”

[2] Knickerbocker, B.  “Guantanamo for U.S. Citizens? Senate Bill Raises Questions.” December 3, 2011.  16 March 2012.

[3] Kinard, M. American Stasi: Fusion Centers and Domestic Spying.  Badger Wordsmith, LLC.  Wales, WI. 2012.

[4] Walker, J. “What Cases have the Patriot Act’s Sneak-and-Peek Warrants been used for?”  September 7, 2011.  16 March 2012.